Showing posts with label Stephen Recker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen Recker. Show all posts

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Journey in time: 'Stunning' 1891 Antietam images surface

The fence in the background runs along the Smoketown Road, the route the XII Corps 
took to the battlefield. (John Banks collection | Click on images to enlarge.)
On the back mounting of each image, Antietam veteran John Mead Gould wrote a detailed
 description. "The mulberry tree so prominent here has probably grown since the war," he noted on this one.

Like this blog on Facebook
 | Follow me on Twitter

At 4 p.m. on Sept. 18, 1891, Oliver Cromwell Gould, son of 10th Maine veteran John Mead Gould, shot an image of the East Woods at Antietam, where his father had witnessed momentous events 29 years earlier. Three days later, at 8 a.m., Oliver focused his camera on a nearby 10-acre field (above image) that included a prominent mulberry tree. In the far distance, a wooden fence stretched along the old Smoketown Road -- the route his father took to battle on Sept. 17, 1862.

A war-time image of John Mead Gould.
(Courtesy Nicholas Picerno)
We know precisely when and where these historic images were taken because of the meticulousness of John Gould, who accompanied his 21-year-old son at Antietam and wrote details about each photograph in pen on the back mounting for each. "Camera ... on the knoll where the 128th Penn first stood," noted the 51-year-old former officer in neat handwriting about the first image. "In 1862 the woods extended a few yards west of the fence here seen."

Regarding the second image, Gould wrote: "The 10th Maine crossed the Smoketown road (as well as I can tell) about where the small bush is growing, to right of the mulberry tree. We came to 'front' there east of the road, then advanced down & up the gentle slope & deployed about in the shadow of the tree on the extreme right of the picture."

Believed lost to history, the rare photographs are among six to have recently surfaced in New Jersey -- the largest stash of Gould images yet to be discovered. A unique window into the early, post-war appearance of the battlefield, the photographs have excited Antietam historians, who are hopeful even more "Goulds" will be discovered. According to a detailed logbook kept by the former 10th Maine officer, Oliver Gould took at least two dozen images at Antietam in 1891, including shots of the iconic Dunker Church. Only one other 1891 Gould Antietam image, owned by a Virginia collector, had previously been discovered.

"The 1891 Gould images are truly stunning, as they offer an early, pristine view of Antietam battlefield that many of us never thought we would see, complete with the voice of a veteran pointing out particulars in a way we usually just dream about," said Stephen Recker, whose 2012 book, Rare Images at Antietam And the Photographers Who Took Them, documented historical images taken at the battlefield. Collaborating with 10th Maine expert Nicholas Picerno and preeminent Antietam historian Tom Clemens, Recker pieced together the story of the Gould images in his book.

A circa-1920 photograph of John Mead Gould, 
who died in 1930.
(Courtesy Nicholas Picerno)
"But while we found the documentation for his 1891 images at Duke University," Recker noted, "it was those 'undiscovered' images that we really wanted to see." Gould's images were taken before the War Department greatly altered the lay of the land in 1895, when it added avenues for tourists to use to view the battlefield.

The Gould images once belonged to Irving B. Lovell, an uncle of Bill and Marie Trembley, who were first shown the photographs decades ago. In 2016, four years after the World War II veteran died at age 92, the Trembleys found the package containing the Antietam images in a closet while cleaning out Lovell's house and small cabin in Eastport, Maine. The photos weren't viewed by the couple again until November 2017, when Marie opened the large manila package with the words "Civil War photos" written in red marker on the side. When and where Lovell, who lived most of his life in New Jersey, got the images is unknown.

The author of this post acquired the images in early January 2018.

A bright man who was good with numbers, Gould worked for his father's bank in Portland, Maine before the Civil War. In April 1861, he enlisted in the Portland Light Guards, Company C of the 1st Maine. The regiment served in the defenses of Washington, returning to Maine to be mustered out in August 1861. In September that year, Gould re-enlisted in the new 10th Maine for two years' service, advancing to sergeant major. Promoted to 2nd lieutenant, he served in the Valley Campaign in early 1862, and saw his first significant action at Cedar Mountain on Aug. 9, 1862.

General Joseph Mansfield, mortally
wounded at Antietam on Sept. 17, 1862.
(Middlesex County Historical Society)
But Antietam had by far the most dramatic impact on Gould's life. It was in the East Woods on the morning of Sept. 17, 1862, that the 22-year-old adjutant was the first to reach a mortally wounded General Joseph Mansfield, shot while atop his white horse as he directed troops in his XII Corps. Gould was among four soldiers to carry Mansfield to the rear.

"Passing still in front of our line and nearer to the enemy, [Mansfield] attempted to ride over the rail fence which separated a lane from the ploughed land where most of our regiment were posted," Gould wrote to Mansfield's widow on Dec. 2, 1862. "The horse would not jump it, and the General dismounting led him over. He passed to the rear of the Regimental line, when a gust of wind blew aside his coat, and I discovered that his whole front was covered with blood."

Antietam was Mansfield's first and last battlefield command. The 58-year-old officer from Middletown, Conn., died the next morning.

After the war, Gould -- who became historian, treasurer and secretary for a Maine veterans' group -- was especially keen on documenting his regiment's role at Antietam. Seemingly no detail was too small. For years, he kept up a lively correspondence with veterans on both sides regarding Mansfield's wounding and death, troop movements and much more. In the 1890s, he provided hundreds of those letters to the Antietam Battlefield Board, adding significantly to the understanding of the battle. And, in 1895, Gould had published a pamphlet on Mansfield's death, noting minute details of the XII Corps' commander's demise.

Antietam map in John Mead Gould's 1895 published work on the mortal wounding of
General Joseph Mansfield. The East Woods, where the 10th Maine fought, appears at center.
Clemens, who edited a massive, authoritative history of the Maryland Campaign compiled by Union veteran Ezra Carman, believes Gould may be the greatest of all Antietam historians.

"He was only interested in the fighting in East Woods and who killed Mansfield, but wound up getting into a lot more than that," he said. "At one point there were six or seven different accounts of where Mansfield was killed, and Gould sorted them out, determining that at least three were people mistaking Colonel William Goodrich of the 60th New York for Mansfield. He really grilled his subjects, asking detailed questions, and his letters, which he routinely shared with Carman, are very helpful for details on fighting in the north end of the field."

In 1889, John Gould tried to document the battlefield photographically himself. Using the recently introduced Kodak camera, among the first cameras easy enough for amateurs to use, he shot images of the East Woods. The experience was unsatisfying -- and unproductive, too. The camera, Recker notes in his book, was cumbersome to use. It didn’t even have a view finder, an innovation that would come with the next version of the Kodak.

"Among the demerits of the work is the fact that I got 'rattled' & made 'doubles' & I forgot to make a note of what I was doing," he wrote to 128th Pennsylvania veteran Frederick Yeager in 1894. "So when I got my pictures from the printer I couldn't identify many of them. In truth the visit of 1889 was little more than an aggravation, but it resulted in determining me to go again ..."

John Mead Gould appears in the background of this image that shows the position 
of two 10th Maine companies on Sept. 17, 1862. It was taken Sept. 18, 1891, at 2 p.m. 
This photograph, taken on Sept. 21, 1891, shows the site of the mortal wounding of  Joseph Mansfield.
(CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE)
And so John and Oliver returned to the battlefield in 1891 to photographically document the sites of the horrible events of mid-September 1862.

In the other four recently discovered Gould images, Oliver focused exclusively on the area of the East Woods, site of fighting the night of Sept. 16, 1862, and intense fighting the next day. In one of those photographs, someone -- probably John Gould himself -- wrote in the margin the position where Mansfield was mortally wounded. Ever meticulous, Gould noted on the back mounting an image number as well as the time the photograph was taken ("September 21, 1891, 5 p.m.") and position of his son's camera ("on enemy's ground 110 yards from the position of extreme right Co. H of 10th Maine”).

In another image, Gould noted the changes on the battlefield since the war. "Potatoes and corn take the place of great oaks, of which one only remains hereabouts as seen," he wrote about a photograph of what once was the East Woods. And on another, he wrote in the margins of the image the positions of the 128th Pennsylvania and 10th Maine. Leaving breadcrumbs for future historians to pinpoint the spot, he wrote on the back mounting of the image: "Camera in the three-cornered clover field ten paces from the Smoketown Road & about 100 yards west of where the East Woods were in 1862. The western face of the woods has been cut off."

After journeying from New Jersey to their new home, the photographs will soon be on the road again, to Antietam, where this story began long ago. We'll match up the images on the battlefield to shoot present-day versions of the six Gould photographs.

And, of course, we'll keep a lookout for other Gould images from 1891. Perhaps those historic images from this series will turn up in an attic or in a flea market near you.

This photograph shows the route of march by the 10th Maine onto the battlefield.
A  tattered backing on the above photograph includes Gould's detailed description of the image.
(CLICK TO ENLARGE)
"Potatoes and corn take the place of great oaks, of which one only remains hereabouts as seen
 in this picture," Gould wrote on the back mounting of this photograph. After the war, many of
 the trees in the East Woods were cut down. (John Banks collection)
"The knoll of the 128th Pa. and position of 10th Maine in opposite edge of woods are shown by arrows,"
Gould noted of this image, taken near the East Woods. (John Banks collection)

Have something to add (or correct) in this post? E-mail me here.


SOURCES


-- Gould, John Mead, Joseph K.F. Mansfield, A Narrative of Events Connected With His Mortal Wounding, Portland, Maine, Stephen Berry Printer, 1895.
-- Recker, Stephen, Rare Images of Antietam and the Photographers Who Took Them, Sharpsburg, Md., Another Software Miracle LLC, 2012.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

1885 image of Antietam National Cemetery

An 1885 cabinet card image of Antietam National Cemetery, taken by an
 unknown photographer.
(CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE.)
A close-up of the image shows "Old Simon," the massive monument,
 in the left background.
As Antietam rare image expert Stephen Recker can attest, old photographs of the battlefield turn up every so often at Civil War shows and even on eBay. Recker features many old images of Antietam, some never before published, in his recently published book. (I especially love the images he included of the unveiling of the 16th Connecticut monument.) At the Gettysburg Civil War Show last weekend, I purchased the cabinet card image above of Antietam National Cemetery entrance, taken in September 1885 by an unknown photographer.  The content isn't spectacular, but it is a unique look of  the cemetery 127 years ago.

Tuesday, October 02, 2012

Antietam: An old battlefield image?

Is this an old photograph of Dunker Church at Antietam? (Connecticut State Library archives)
CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE.
While researching a story on this 16th Connecticut captain at the Connecticut State Library archives recently, I found this image among a cache of other old photographs. There was no certain identification on the back of the image, but I think the large whitewashed building at the left center is the Dunker Church on the Antietam battlefield. That would make the prominent road in the photograph the famous Hagerstown Pike and the road that branches off in the left distance the Smoketown Road. The image appears to have been taken in the late 19th or early 20th century. If anyone knows for certain what this image shows and who took it, it would be Stephen Recker, author of the recently released (and highly acclaimed) "Rare Images of Antietam." Perhaps he'll weigh in with his thoughts.

UPDATE FROM STEPHEN RECKER: "Thanks for the kind words. Yes, that is the Hagerstown Pike in a photo taken by John H. Wagoner of Hagerstown in the 1890s. It appears in Martin Burgan's Guide book, published first in 1906. I am raffling a 1928 edition of that guide book this weekend at the Center For Civil War Photography's Antietam Seminar. Again, keep up the great work and thanks for the plug!"

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Author Q&A: 'Rare Images Of Antietam'

Stephen Recker's book will be available by the 150th anniversary of Antietam on Sept. 17.
Over a beer or two (Yuengling!) and sandwiches at Captain Benders Tavern in Sharpsburg, Md., the day before Connecticut Day in April, Stephen Recker gave Civil War blogger John Rogers (8th Connecticut private Oliver Cromwell Case blog) and me a sneak preview of his new book, "Rare Images of Antietam." If the preview is as good as the final result, you will be very impressed.

A longtime history buff, Recker, 54, isn't new to the Civil War publishing scene. He produced Virtual Gettysburg, a cool interactive battlefield guide, several years ago, and Antietam Artifacts, a CD of pre-1930 postcards of the Maryland Campaign. But "Rare Images Of Antietam" may be his tour de force. For three decades, the ultimate Antietam photography book on my bookshelf has been William Frassanito's terrific "Antietam: The Photographic Legacy of America's Bloodiest Day."  Thirty years from now, a well-worn copy of Recker's book may take a spot next to my dog-eared copy of Frassanito's work.

In case you're wondering, "Rare Images of Antietam" will be available in time for the 150th anniversary of the battle next month. Earlier today, Recker, who lives near the battlefield, took time out to explain why he did the book, what's of interest in it for those of us who are fascinated with Connecticut's role in the battle and more.

Stephen Recker: "Collecting rare images
of Antietam was slow-going at first."
Why do this book on Antietam?

Recker: Thanks for the interest. I moved out here from California 10 years ago with an eye on marketing Virtual Gettysburg and producing Virtual Antietam. At some point, though, my photograph collection got so huge and I found so many important images and so much info on the photographers that I changed my focus.

You've worked quite awhile on this -- several years, correct? Why did it take so long?

Recker: Collecting rare images of Antietam was slow going at first. It was five years of collecting rare Antietam postcards -- the only place I could find images of Antietam -- before I bought my first important collection of photographs. I was then off and running. After that it has been five years of one huge find after another. Tom Clemens (a noted Antietam expert) once told me he would not trade my luck for a license to steal. I now either own or have scans of over 700 rare Antietam images, most unknown and unpublished.

I have a keen interest in the four Connecticut regiments that fought at Antietam. What will the reader find Connecticut related in "Rare Images of Antietam"?

Recker: My favorite regiment is the 16th Connecticut. At a show years back, I saw images taken on their dedication day, one of the monument with the flag on it, one just after the dedication with veterans standing nearby. To my dismay, someone bought them out from under my nose. After five years of hunting, I tracked them down and they are in the book. I also feature the first images of Mumma’s Cornfield, fought across by the 14th Connecticut. These were taken in 1891, and show 14th Connecticut veterans surveying the field. After the battle, people thought that Mumma’s Cornfield would be remembered as well as Miller’s, but instead it has been forgotten. I hope these images will revitalize interest. I also have "then and nows" for the images in the 14th Connecticut 1891 reunion book.

You won't find this damaged William Tipton image of the 16th
Connecticut  monument
in "Rare Images of Antietam." But there
 are  plenty of images in the book related to Connecticut's role.
 (Connecticut State Library Civil War collection)
You have an extensive Antietam collection. Are some of the images from your collection in the book?

Recker: I would say the majority are mine, but I wanted to represent all of the major collections that I have found, both in private and public collections. It took me years to search out where some of the best Antietam images are, and I thought that instead of simply showcasing my images, it would be important to let other historians know about these collections so that they could use my book as a starting point, not the final word. It was initially my desire to do a huge opus and include everything in a comprehensive study, but I simply found way too much (a blessing and a curse) and decided that this first volume would be more meaningful (and publishable by the anniversary) if I narrowed the focus and featured some of my more important finds.

What was your most exciting find?

Recker: That has changed many times in the course of writing the book. When I do talks, people seem greatly moved by the only known photographs of the original wooden markers in Antietam National Cemetery, which I use to show that the bodies are not buried under the current stone markers. I found a photograph, previously thought to be Lincoln at Gettysburg, that is actually the only known photograph of the dedication of Antietam’s cemetery. Then I found the McFarland Album, Ezra Carman’s photograph collection, John Mead Gould’s ‘Kodaks’ of the East Woods, the list goes on. But the single-most exciting find for me personally is that the first post-Gardner photograph taken on Antietam Battlefield bears the backmark of a photographer named E.M. Recker.

Is there enough material out there to do another book like this on Antietam?

Recker: I figure that I have enough material for about five more volumes of A+ images. But I don’t want to simply fill up books with photographs. It took me 10 years of hunting to find the supporting info for each of the images that I feature in my book. And it took a lot of work to make a book that the casual observer would enjoy as much as the serious student. But now that I have the images scanned and I have the book template created, I am poised to publish multiple volumes in relative short order and get these photographs out where people can enjoy them. Thanks again for the opportunity to talk about this first volume.